- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I get that Johnny has no clue at all that the only people involved with Stefan’s brainwashing was Li Shin, Kristen De Mira & Rolf. why does he think that EJ was in on it, given that there’s no story for Johnny to think that. Wendy: She wants to protect her brother, it has been brought up, but yet, she has no qualms at all in exposing that he did this to Stefan, if she is so protective of her brother, why expose what he did to Stefan? Remember, I know that Orpheus is in prison, & that he too knows that Stefan is alive, but yet, Johnny has no clue that EJ was told & what really bothers me about this story is that Stefan was shot 4 years ago, but RH’s Li has only had been on for 2 years & yet, they are playing the story out that he knew that Stef had been alive for 4 years?
I think Johnny suspects EJ knew about the brainwashing because it benefits EJ for Stefan to have no happy memories of Gabi. If Stefan hates Gabi, he’ll vote with EJ, a brother he never knew prior to being brought back to life.
It may benefit EJ, business wise, but remember, he was told who was alive for 4 years, so why would it matter as to how it benefits him? Remember, with Stefan having no memory at all of his previous life as Stefan & only has memories of Chloe, what happens once he gets all of his memories back, remember, when Will got all of his memories back & remembered his life with Sonny, he went back to Sonny, what happens once Stefan gets all of his memories back, finds out as to what Gabi had done with his heart, do you really think he would dump Chloe & go back to Gabi, given what she did with his heart?
Explain how RH’s Li had been on for 4 years to know how long Rolf kept him alive when RH’s Li only had been on for two years?
This is about Paulina & this is two-fold: This is the second. To me, what I find morally repugnant is that the writers created what transpired in college way before they created the character, meaning, what transpired first, the character doing what or when the character was incepted. Meaning, that they can’t prove that Chanel did anything then, because the incident happened way before they created the character, don’t you think?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.