Home › Forums › Salem Place: The Main Board › Brady and Nicole
- This topic has 17 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by Bonbon.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 20, 2010 at 6:52 pm #1457powerpaw2Participant
I love these two together, but it seems like the only onscreen interaction between them involves doinking. Come on writers! Stop making me FF through their scenese.
December 20, 2010 at 8:30 pm #19207majencoParticipantYou mean Boinking. ; )
December 20, 2010 at 9:55 pm #19208NoraParticipantMaybe she meant a cross between drinking and boinking??? LOL. they do both of those ALOT.
December 20, 2010 at 10:05 pm #19210majencoParticipantYeah at first I thought she meant drinking but they do seem to do both!
December 20, 2010 at 10:47 pm #19211caseyParticipantIs it simply lust? Days has not shown me much evidence of anything deeper.
December 21, 2010 at 12:08 am #19216powerpaw2ParticipantDoinking, boinking, bonking, doing the horizontal bop, etc….
December 21, 2010 at 3:42 am #19221luckeyParticipantright there in Stefano’s living room with Mary and Sidney in the house! I had to laugh at how absurd this writing is. Anyone could walk in at any moment, including EJ! I guess "Days" can’t afford a set to show the guest house on the Dimera compound.
December 21, 2010 at 3:52 am #1922253tdogsParticipantformer porn movie writers – I know that’s not a nice comment but I’m getting offended at the frequency that they throw couples together while playing musical partners. I know they are trying to be edgy for the ratings so they can sell to the advertisers but come on, some of the scenes ought to be after 10:00 p.m. And caveat here: I am not a prude. I just want quality writing. Give me a story I’m interested in watching instead of having the actors pop off their clothes every other days with each other, just because they can’t think of what else the characters should do or say with dialog.
December 21, 2010 at 12:40 pm #19228BonbonParticipantto say the least. I think they both crave that adrenaline rush. Did you notice that Brady didn’t respond when Nicole told him she loved him?
I believe the writers are still stuck in the past when people DID want to see the lust and passion on their soaps. But it has become so commonplace now in the movies, on TV, and everywhere around us, it is no longer something we are interested in watching.
Like nudity, I much rather see the intimation of what’s going to happen and then switch to the aftermath than be subjected to the actual deed…boinking, doinking, or whatever you want to call it.
December 21, 2010 at 1:06 pm #19231NoraParticipantI noticed that Bonbon, definitly, it’s just like Nathan and Stephanie, although I have heard Nathan more recently, not that I believe it! Nathan and stephanie still bore me to tears! and I dont think Mel and Nathan will be much better.
December 21, 2010 at 4:09 pm #19236PattiParticipantto bring Brady into the DiMera mansion and have passionate sex on Stefano’s sofa …. LOL …. this will undoubtedly cost you, Nicole, because someone was watching. I was almost hoping for Stefano to walk through the door right in the middle of that little lovefest. I don’t know what to think of Brady these days. One minute I think he’s still playing Nicole, and the next I think she’s like a magnet that he’s drawn to, but for purely satisfying his libido and nothing more. Nicole, on the other hand, I believe does love Brady, although I still would rather see her with E.J. Not that I want her to have Sydney, because I definitely do not, but I have always preferred them together. They seem to be good for one another in a sick sort of way. God help her, though, if, or I should say when, this little afternoon delight gets back to E.J. or Stefano. She can surely kiss Sydney goodbye (so hurry up with it, will you writers). As for Brady, throwing the glass into the fireplace, and Nicole following suit, was a bit much. I mean Mary and Sydney, and I’m assuming other staff were in the mansion, so that was totally unrealistic for them to create a noise that surely would have had at least Mary and/or Harold running. James was right ….. stupid f’g writing.
December 21, 2010 at 4:30 pm #19239GoodyParticipantwould have recreational sex in someone else’s living room? It is not love or even lust; it is stupid. I know it is for the plot so someone can see them together and probably tell, but it is still really bad writing. Anyway, a couch is so uncomfortable when compared to a bed.
Goody
December 21, 2010 at 5:59 pm #19244powerpaw2ParticipantWhen I was 19, I just HAD to find out what the big deal was about X rated movies. So I talked an older friend into going to one. It was all I could do to not bust out laughing at how ridiculous it was. We ended up leaving the movie and going to a bar.
December 21, 2010 at 8:07 pm #19246luckeyParticipant"Deep Throat" with another married couple. We two wives sat next to each other and the side comments we were making during the movie had the crowd around us laughing hysterically! They complimented us as we all were walking out of the theater after it ended saying how much more they enjoyed the movie with our "play by play". We’re still very good friends with this couple and continue to get a good laugh about it whenever we bring it up.
December 21, 2010 at 9:16 pm #19251majencoParticipantOh and on a gross sidenote, did you hear Nicole say she had ideas about all the things they could do with Stefano’s precious chess set? WTH is she going to do with it? Eeeeeeeeew!!!!!!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.