- This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
When Will was accused of killing Stefano, Tate’s accused of being the cause of Holly’s O.D., when Will shot EJ in the head, yes, Will did do that, that’s where it deviates, but still, EJ isn’t blackmailing Tate the way EJ blackmailed Will. Lucas went to prison for Will when it came to EJ’s shooting, so what’s with Brady saying that his hands are tied, with the bad blood that Brady & EJ have for each other is synonymous that EJ had for Lucas, but still Lucas did go to prison for Will, why couldn’t Brady make that sacrifice for Tate the same way that Lucas did for Will, so hoe exactly were Brady’s hands, TIED, so to speak?
I think Brady already tried to take the blame for Tate and that got him nowhere. As a matter of fact, it kind of backfired on him. Why not insist that Holly tell the freaking truth! That self-centered girl is a damn liar!
If it worked on Lucas, then why did it backfire on Brady. With the bad blood between Brady & EJ, why didn’t EJ allow it instead of having it backfire on Brady?
But yet there was a need for Lucas to take the rap & went to prison for it, wasn’t it? So was it needed to poke holes in Brady’s story to shoot it down?
That’s what we are getting. Tate accused of slipping narcotics to Holly, the same way Will was accused of killing Stephano when Neil came out of the woodwork to give Will an alibi, right? What I don’t get is that when Tate had said that he had found Holly after her overdose, wouldn’t that show that she had the narcotics on her, showing her possession of them & yet no one takes a hint, now do they? Anyone who’s anyone could come forward & give Tate an alibi as to where Holly had bought those narcotics, i.e. the school grounds, i.e. what Neil did for Will when they were at the Spot, together.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.