Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 3,499 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Questions about Kate/Vivian scene #22147
    53tdogs
    Participant

    she’d plot and stomp on Vivy in a round about way to where Vivy would never see it coming…Kate is not the full frontal attack type, she’s more of a hurt you when you aren’t looking type.  I’m referencing this on the chocolate brownies and other devious things she’s done.  While I love both Vivy and Kate, I sure hope that Stefano doesn’t take up with Vivian if Kate does not win in this "-itch" slap fest.

    in reply to: Questions about Kate/Vivian scene #22146
    53tdogs
    Participant

    running the emerging market for the company there. 

    in reply to: Jen Really Pushing It #22135
    53tdogs
    Participant

    is acting or acts is the PTB/writers will not let a woman stand alone and have a mature, adult relationship with a man as just a friend or co-worker. The exceptions I see being Mag and Vic, – although, their relationship is only on the first date.   Hope and Bo – they compliment and have repect for each other and Kate and Stefano – because both will not take any guff from anyone up to and including themselves. 

    Would that they would write Jennifer and the rest of the women on the show…Jennifer used to be a strong woman – although, comparing her to "duffus" Jack (when they wrote Jack as a clown always) is the only time in my Day’s watching that I remember her from.

    in reply to: Stephanie Puhleeze #22134
    53tdogs
    Participant

    NananaaaaaaaaaaaaaaNa – NaaaaNaNaaaNa…hey – heh gooooooooooobye!  Goodbye Stephanie! (character – not actress). 

    in reply to: Stephanie Puhleeze #22133
    53tdogs
    Participant

    Ambien to fall asleep, I just click on the newest episode of DOOL and snorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr away…

    in reply to: new singing competition on nbc #22125
    53tdogs
    Participant

    language and all; so much more for them to argue their cases…but seems like "jury of your peers" has gone out the window (circa the stats on current prision populations and at the other end of the spectrum – the OJ case).

    I think that the name should be blanked out of the defendent’s case as well as the defendants voice be altered as well.  The case would be a lot less biased if the jury and/or judge presiding over case would only hear the facts presented on both sides. 

    I don’t think the average Joe Blow jurist on a panel can assertain body language, mannerisms or fine nuances based on what they see in people.  Humans come with a certain bias towards their fellow man no matter how much they protest they can remain fair and listen to only the facts of the case. 

    I’m permanently excused from jury duty, but have served in the past and you can tell from the comments of the jury that they predispose guilt or innocence based on looks.  A man with dreadlocks and rostifarian clothing is going to get sentenced to jail over a goldy locks girl-scout looking suit and tie type any day of the week. "Handsome" people get off and "ugly" people do time just based on their looks alone.

    in reply to: REsults AI! WOW! #22099
    53tdogs
    Participant

    their (judges) one and only save-U-now-card – there’s now no suspense up until the last moment.  And this shows me that America’s votes don’t really count.  Like you said, we know the judges really have their favorites up front – reminds me too much of Simon.  I really FF’d through most of this show anyway…it seems like it’s become one long Coke, or Ford commerical anymore. 

    in reply to: Comcast Soap area is saying something about… #22098
    53tdogs
    Participant

    and the gist of what was going on, going to happen, but ya didn’t have to see them in the in-between scenes.

    in reply to: another spoiler #22097
    53tdogs
    Participant

    "Stephanie" list…and FF’d button is being used quite a bit with these two now days when they come on…must run in the "gene pool" in their family – the quick to bed and quicker to fights…

    in reply to: Comcast Soap area is saying something about… #22092
    53tdogs
    Participant

    whatever, I just don’t want "in-your-face" and that goes for the bed scenes with the straights too – I know out gay folks and they act and think like you and your friends Powerpaw2…live and let live but don’t throw it around. 

    I am sick of turning on my t.v. and seeing what is soft porn on t.v. – I watch for the SL’s, the romance, a kiss or show me after the fact laying in bed if you are going to have to go there…Maybe it’s my age but I even at when I was younger never cared to watch the mess up the sheets scenes. 

    Maybe that’s why I like Victor and Maggies SL so much.  Stephano and Kate’s kiss even worked the other day as it didn’t end up with them in down and dirty in the sheets like the younger crowd on DOOL does all the time – lot of FF’ding for me.  Guess I’m a prude after all…

    in reply to: Stephanie Puhleeze #22080
    53tdogs
    Participant

    months for that matter and my FF’d button wouldn’t be used once!  They are just so cute together!  I hope for big story lines with those two and not just "fluff" background pieces…come on writers!  Let’s do it!

    in reply to: new singing competition on nbc #22071
    53tdogs
    Participant

    cannot see what the defendent looks like.  More fair in the long run I think as people tend to judge on looks and mannerisms…

    in reply to: new singing competition on nbc #22070
    53tdogs
    Participant

    cannot see what the defendent looks like.  More fair in the long run I think as people tend to judge on looks and mannerisms…

    in reply to: Comcast Soap area is saying something about… #22069
    53tdogs
    Participant

    the Day for me too.

    in reply to: Stephanie Puhleeze #22068
    53tdogs
    Participant

    thinking…

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 3,499 total)