Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,456 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Just read this. Thoughts anyone? #32409
    SW
    Participant

     have negatively impacted the ratings.  There were people who claimed they wouldn’t watch the show if it went forward with the gay storyline.  Not sure if they did or not.  I think it was one of the better written stories these writers wrote.  I’m not interested in seeing gay love scenes but the process of seeing Will have doubts and then admit it, was good writing/acting. 

    in reply to: Are they going to kill Ian? #32408
    SW
    Participant

     Potential killers/motives:

    Kate: She’s angry with his return and that she did the deed with him and he could be threatening to reveal it to Stefano.

    Stefano: He knows Kate and Ian were together and he’s going to get his revenge by setting it up to appear as though Kate killed Ian and then he’ll pretend to ‘save’ her from being arrested and sent to jail.

    Brady: He wants to be with Madison and she is being threatened by Ian.

    Madison: She wants to be with Brady and Ian is stopping her.

    Victor: He wants to be rid of Ian as head of his company and hates that Brady can’t be with the woman he loves.

    ISA: Ian is the guy that they are trying to nail for something evil. 

    EJ: Ian is blackmailing him over something to come out in the future – maybe Ian is his real father??? lol

    Anyone I missed in the potential killers?  Remember this is all speculation not spoiler.

    in reply to: Big Cast Cuts Coming to Days!! #32398
    SW
    Participant

     John being charged with stealing the pension funds. EJ admitted he did it. Stefano was the one that helped Hope get the info to clear John.  I feel like I don’t know some of these characters as they are switching things too often.  If EJ fingers Stefano for the John stuff, he’s identifying an innocent (cough, cough) man, at least for the fund stealing!  lol

    What was in Alice’s proof to Stefano??? We still don’t know that!

    in reply to: Grief Sex!!!! #32397
    SW
    Participant

     But what’s really crazy is that he survived and didn’t have her arrested!

    in reply to: Grief Sex!!!! #32384
    SW
    Participant

     the production office.  She was let go quite a long time ago though.  It used to be great when we could ask questions and get the real answers.  I also believe Allison Sweeney visited here at one time.  She posted before the board had to be protected due to ‘trolls’ posting.

     

    in reply to: Grief Sex!!!! #32380
    SW
    Participant

     raped you/blackmailed you into sex, had a kid with and then were marrying him when your son tried to kill him?? lol   Not to mention that you supposedly hate the guy’s guts! lol

    in reply to: Ian’s robe! #32335
    SW
    Participant

     you really tell it like it is Bonbon!! ROFL!

    in reply to: Last 5 minutes #32334
    SW
    Participant

     something very different with him now.  You could be right in he’s playing the role.  I do remember a little ‘stiffness’ but he was playing a shrink there and then a victim.  He’s not a ‘romantic leading man’ type (on either show).  I do suspect he’s had either too much botox or something so that he doesn’t look like he’s aging appropriately.  I know we’re not supposed to comment on actor’s looks so I’ll leave it at that.  

    I don’t like his character at all as I feel there is something evil going on underneath.  Was Stefano the guy that blackmailed him to stay away from Kate?  If so, why is he back now?  Or was it Victor and that’s why he took his company to run? – this one doesn’t make sense as it makes Victor look like  an idiot for not knowing who he was.  As to the whole story with Kate and him being lovers in the past – it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense either.  Kate has been on since Austin/Billie returned and Lucas was introduced.  Lucas was the product of the affair with Bill Horton and the others were from her marriage to the Reed creep! Gee, Kate must be really into bad guys – other than Bill Horton (who was cheating on Laura at the time so he’s a mild loser) she repeatedly picks evil losers! 

    in reply to: Last 5 minutes #32322
    SW
    Participant

     what I saw of the two of them (Kate and Ian), there is no chemistry and it looked like they both were revolted by the scenes.  Barf!!!  For once, I would actually egg Stefano on if he wants to murder Ian!  Do the world a huge favor!! And what was with the guy hitting on Brady???

    in reply to: Question. Edible arrangements? #32298
    SW
    Participant

     the tiniest one is around $30 here and the fruit is probably costing less tha 5.  It’s an alternative to someone who is allergic to flowers or doesn’t like them.  A novelty at best.  

    in reply to: Safari pictures #32297
    SW
    Participant

     thanks for sharing them!  It looks like you had a great time and a great camera.  You couldn’t pay me enough to sit on that lion bait chair while driving around! lol

    in reply to: Soapnet is going away #32296
    SW
    Participant

     pre-empt for anything that happens.  From what I have heard, soap net is staying on indefinitely as they are having issues with Disney Jr.   A VCR doesn’t solve the problem of a network that constantly interrupts.  I don’t object to Disney Jr. but I do hate that TIIC are substituting SoapNet for it.  The  ads on SoapNet are all for Chew/Revolution whick I am sure is annoying to those who watched AMC or OLTL (which were dumped in favor of that stuff). Even Katie Curic is demanding that GH be her lead in versus the Rev as it is so low in ratings.  I also think that the teen set will not be able to watch GH when they move it to 2 pm as they are most likely still in school at that hour.  Maybe that is another of their plans: move it so the ratings drop and they can justify cancelling another soap?

     

    in reply to: “Days” gets new Head Writing team #32276
    SW
    Participant

     as I remember when NBC renewed Days at one point and told KC that if he was renewed James Reilly would be writing the show again and we all know how that turned out! Can we spell d-i-s–a-s-t-e-r???  I do believe that the network sticks their nose into shows more than they should.  Look what happened to OLTL and AMC all in favor of ‘talking crap’ that lost them a big chunk of audience but they didn’t seem to learn from it either.

     

    in reply to: Soapnet is going away #32264
    SW
    Participant

     from say 8 or 9pm to 5am. That way they can let the kids watch during the day when soapnet only had reruns and let the soaps have the later evening hours when pre-schoolers SHOULD be in bed getting the sleep that research indicates they need. I hate to think that ABC is encouraging parents to let their kids watch TV 24 hours a day.  There’s room for both if the network would only wise up!  But, I guess the network would rather cultivate a junior generation of fans who will be demanding the products that their advertisers put out.  

    in reply to: Spoilers from dayscafe #32228
    SW
    Participant

     can be toxic or it could mean that they were both on chemicals as in drunk! I am guessing they both had been drinking, maybe celebrating him coming out and admitting he’s gay?

     

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,456 total)