Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Awe – yea that image was a lot for me too. But it had more to do with the fact that Lauren is way too talented of an actress to be opposite boring as H*LL Galen… YUCK YUCK YUCK
And of course as Aiden/Hope make love and she realizes she loves him Aiden’s dead wife will come to Salem LOL
Totes agree
And yes – the last time I checked "bedded" means SLEPT with – NOT pursued!!!
Yes – E.J. is a cad and YES – he has a pattern…. SAMI!!! All the women you listed have one thing in common – he always goes back to Sami!!! It’s always been Sami – it always will be Sami. Is their relatiionship destructive? Sure!!! But at least they didn’t "fall in love" bumping into each other Horton Town Square!!! Sorry – I rather watch and witness their i love you/i hate you/i love you any day over "oops – I didn’t see where I was going and now i love you" story that we have gotten with so many other Salem "couples."
So yes to summarize…. EJ is a cad… Abby is a WHORE (I do like Sex Kitten btw – but she’s like a lil whore in the making hah) – and she does NOT deserve a pass. And that daddy card – GMAB!!! She’s not lusting after these men b/c she’s missing Jack – she’s lusting after them b/c…. well, she’s a whore
Where in my post did I say Abby pursued EJ?!? Let’s not mince words here…
What I DID say was that Abby is a whore and she should be judged for BEDDING an engaged man. This is a pattern for her – and she continues to get a pass for it. Why?!? Why does she get a pass?
EJ is/was wrong – 100%!!! But my point of the post was about Abby…. Why shouldn’t she be judged? If this was ANYONE else they would have been looked down on, talked about and ridiculed. She accused Austin of something that did NOT exist… She bedded an engaged man – and yes, she did go after him at some point.
I’m not saying EJ is inncocent here – but when you think about the "free pass" sweet little Abby is getting all it does it help me to justify Sami’s rage. If the town treated Abby the way anyone else would be treated if they did what she did then I can see us saying "Sami’s over reacting."
Hehe…. I think Sami EVENTUALLY orchestrated that "friendship" but Abby certainly could have said no. She didn’t b/c she felt guilty b/c she knew what she did (was doing) was wrong.
But when i talk about lust as a motive it makes it more inexcusable b/c it is NOT love. Case in point – when Marlena bedded John behind Roman’s back it was LOVE!!! Marlena LOVED John especially b/c she thought he was Roman. You almost felt for Marlena – and could argue that what she did was UNDERSTANDABLE! Wrong – but you were able to see it how she saw it. She loved two men at once.
Abby’s motive was pure lust – you cannot justify lust. I mean you can’t justify cheating as a whole – but at least with Doc’s situation you can sorta wrap your head round it.
I don’t think he sexually abused Jordan – if so, I think we would have seen that in her intimacy with Rafe (ala Billie back in the day.)
I am so NOT interested in a General Hospital style storyline with a drug kingpin!!! Zzzzz…. He’s amazing as Clyde but I am so far from invested in Jordan that I almost rather he be his own independent character separate from her and Ben.
Seriously DOOL – what the hell are you writers doing?!? This show is so boring it’s barely watcable these days.
And this instance I’m glad it is not Chandler Massey b/c I coulldn’t imagine his Will doing this to his Mom. Plus – I still don’t like Guy Wilson in this role so I want to see him get whats coming to him now.
She just knew. But Sonny had said (when he read it) that you could tell it was Abby he was referring to in the article.
She was a child when she stole Belle…
She stole Belle to protect Roman from her Mom’s affair being exposed…
Nicole stole Sydney for her own selfish needs – even if she did take care of her. And she was an ADULT.
Apples to Oranges…
And you all know I’m a Sami lover so I had to chime in LOL Not that Sami taking Belle was right – but I mean, in that instance it’s not a fair comparison.
I never saw her on OLTL but I’ve heard such amazing things…. I guess she’s not Charlotte Ross AND this writing isn’t really for "her" in a way…
