Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
zodiacpisces1971Participant
With it brought up that it work better for Dimitri & Leo, by having the both of them learning that Trask was in on it with Sloan & how would that work given as to where Dimitri is right now? Then explain as to why it was necessary to throw Porte out with the bathwater, so to speak, think about it. They could easily have Kayla, Maggie, Craig Wesley be sent to Italy to help with Holly’s long-time-care so to speak, so that way Eric ends up learning as to what Sloan has done, he would call Nicole & let her know what went down in Salem, so can fly back in & with EJ as well to nail Sloan & Trask’s coffins shut, right?
- This reply was modified 11 months ago by zodiacpisces1971.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantWith how any DeMira feels about each other, no matter if they do warn each other of upcoming threats to members of their own family from any family member, i.e. when EJ tried to warn Gabi & Stefan when it came to Megan, I can’t see anyone them asking to pass the salt, I can’t see how it would come up at the DeMira family dinner table, now can you, especially with how it was put out there that it was absurd for the writers to bring it up since it happened long ago, especially when Stefan first showed up was way after the Necktie Killings, don’t you think?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantIf he had read about it in the newspaper, how-come it was never brought up by Tyler’s Stefan not until Barash’s Stefan made it known? This also goes with Paul as well, do you really think that Will’s story on the takeover of DiMera Enterprises, what Kate & Sami had done, meaning with the SCC, that is, would have a fledgling from Japan in the MBA would have a interest in?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantThe Pawn was definitely a Stefano slash DeMira Creation, given that when John was masquerading as a priest, he did end up having relations with one of Stefan’s mistresses, i.e. Tori Narita, Paul’s mother & that was Paul ended up being John’s son. So the question arises why is it any of Const’s business to know what went on with The Pawn Story? Especially, given that John is family to Maggie. Because of her great-nephew’s husband is the grandson to the woman that is married to John, right?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantI don’t think that they are going to go there, think about it, yes, Clyde is Clyde, so I can see that he maybe the one behind it, given Lucas’ attack in prison, but think about it, he knows that his son, Ben is now one of the Hortons, meaning, Ciara, remember her grandparents are Doug & Julie on her mother’s side, right, I can’t see Clyde going after Alice & Tom’s family home, given that his daughter-in-law is the great-granddaughter of Alice & Tom, due to Julie’s grandparents, right? I can see Constantine because of what Steve had bellowed to Maggie with her being with Const, he would certainly burn down Maggie’s in-lawa’ home, now wouldn’t he, because with John & Steve being cowards, they don’t see it coming of Const having power over them because they thought it’s a wise move not to have Shane & or The ISA taking Const out, right?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantBut when John was The Pawn, Was John Kapelos’ Constantine a concept then, if he wasn’t a concept then, then no one would buy at all of Conny knowing John’s real name & what he had done as The Pawn or having no memory of his life for that matter, now would he? Then this they had already covered this story once before when John thought he was Roman, when Wayne Northrop had played Roman, then it came out he was John Black back then, right, so there’s a need to play it up again by having a “non-entity” to John’s real name when JK’s character wasn’t created yet, now was it?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantI’m not saying that Drake Hogestyn is a knockoff of Richard Burton, to me the equivalent to Richard Burton & Laurence Olivier was Mike Manning’s Charlie Dale. With that out there, it sets it up big time for John to be devastated in more ways than one, meaning, not only will he learn that DVD’s Timothy isn’t his father, but also because it will also be devastating to John, that if it comes out there, I may not know how that Xander is really Victor’s son & that he & Theresa knew all along of that as well & then learning that Const is his father & will be another Tobin Bell’s Timothy, with what he had done, i.e. brainwashing Paul, unleashing a viral epidemic in the hospital, taking Marlena hostage as well as Rafe’s mother as well & that he had a brainwashed Paul to kill his dad, John, do we really need Constantine taking it out on John’s family & having power over him as well? Then, have Maggie learning that Const had Theresa to abduct her granddaughter just so he can play hero & then learning of this, given, that her grandson Brady, given that Victor was Brady’s grandfather, see what I mean, we don’t need Constantine to brainwash Brady into killing his father, John, they way they had played out with Paul & then play out the demonizing of Theresa to Brady, for when he learns that she stole Sarah’s child & also cut out the entire Kiriakis family out of Victor’s Will & leaving everything to Alex. That’s why I can’t see Xander being Victor’s son, because with romance blossoming between Brady & Theresa that we are seeing now, would Theresa risk doing that to Brady, given what she tried to do to herself given as to where Tate ended up?
- This reply was modified 11 months, 1 week ago by zodiacpisces1971.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantThen why the story of DVD’s Timothy, the dog tags that was verified as to who they were owned by & then play up that Tobin Bell’s character was never John’s father, then having him taking it out on Paul, when he subjected Paul to brainwashing & injecting into Paul, a virus to unleash the hospital, introducing VD’s Timothy to John’s family, then VD’s Timothy wishing his son A Happy New Year, I can’t see Constantine being John’s father, because of as to when Constantine was conceived by the fertile minds of Howard The Duck, I.E. Days of Our Lives. Then there’s this, with when the character of Constantine was conceived, how would he know about The Phoenix story, given that it stayed between John & Steve & their wives, given that JK’s Const wasn’t with any of them when they brought that up, now was he? Then this how did Constantine have heard of it given when he was conceived by the writers of Howard The Duck, I.E. Days.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantBut what I’m getting at is as to when the character was conceived by the fertile minds of the writers, you revert back by using flashbacks to show the viewers their past history, meaning, putting the character with the events of their past, so the viewers would be able to see what went on back then, that’s what I mean. Think about it, Marlena put it out there that when Nurse King was a patient was when she was possessed, was she a patient, not until the writers conceived the story was after Marlena’s possession, this is what I’m getting at?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantBut when their backstories never took place, was it necessary?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantCan you really see with how Zuker hits it out of the ballpark with this story & what she has shown, do you really think that with how she had hit it out of the ballpark, hell hath no fury when it comes to being a mom, there’s no story that would prevent a mom to be with her daughter, no matter what? Jamie Martin Mann is the actor who plays Tate. Don’t you think that it’s very telling that they are refusing to allow Carey’s voice for the intro to the show, given that without Tom & Alice, would there be a show, & you tell me as to how Hall’s Marlena outranks Carey’s Tom?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantBut it was still Will who had told Sonny that Abigail killed Andre, no matter if it wasn’t shown or not, yes, it was shown that Holly’s pills were seen by Tate & were seen by the viewers, what I’m getting at is that they aren’t going anywhere at all that was shown to Tate, wasn’t Tate’s, but Holly’s, not until EJ brought up could Tate be innocent, but they aren’t doing anything to prove it, now are they?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantSo the question that I have is why aren’t they playing up to show that Holly had narcotics in her possession on New Year’s Eve, remember, they did have Gabi saving Will’s hide for Nick’s murder, some time ago, & they did have Will telling Sonny that it was Abigail who had killed Andre, so wouldn’t you think that they should start playing up as to how they can show that Holly had narcotics in her possession on the night in question?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantAll I’m getting at is that when they played out Will’s backstory when it came to EJ’s shooting was perfection, because they had Massey’s own brother playing Will when he told Lucas what he had done to EJ. Then when it came to Bonnie Lockhart, they gave her Adrienne’s backstory by giving the illusion of Bonnie’s rape by Calista’s husband & they played out when after Anjelica died & Hattie went on the lam, they stole the story from Will shooting EJ to have Mimi killing her own father, you tell me as to how a little girl at that age has the strength to handle the weight of a gun, much less now how to shoot, much less shooting her own father with it? That’s what I’m getting at with Everett. What went down in Seattle was before Everett was concepted & he was there to bring up to Stephanie what he was doing in Seattle, is questionable, now isn’t it? What’s wrong with having the character at the time to play out the backstory, i.e. Massey’s brother’s Will telling his father, what he did to EJ?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantYes, I know that they are characters & yes, they have backstories, what I’m getting at is how do they have these backstories, when the characters weren’t concepted, now were they. I do get that I am mixing up reality with this made up story, what I’m getting at is that when they had played up Will shooting EJ, that was played out, where Chandler Massey’s brother was the one who played Will when he told Lucas what he did to EJ, they aren’t doing any of that when it comes to Everett, now are they & we are suppose to buy it when that doesn’t happen to verify their story, that’s what I’m getting at. Remember, what they did with Bonnie Lockhart, they did play out what played out when Bonnie was about to be raped by her brother-in-law, but what I’m getting at is that they gave Adrienne’s backstory to her knock-off & we are suppose to believe Bonnie’s story given what Adrienne faced from her father. Now you see what I’m relaying? Just like when Bonnie had played up that her daughter Mimi had shot & killed her father, how did that work given as to when William Bumiller played his role on Days, I bet you dollars to doughnuts that the character of Mimi wasn’t even concepted at the time that Bumiller played his role, now was she?
- This reply was modified 11 months, 2 weeks ago by zodiacpisces1971.
-
AuthorPosts