Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
zodiacpisces1971Participant
Again: WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT ERIC WON’T LOSE THIS BABY, THEY KNOCKED OFF HIS OTHER THREE, DIDN’T THEY. WHEN HIS CHILD WITH SARAH DIED, THE CHILD THAT DIED WAS IN FACT HIS, BUT THE CHILD THAT NEEDED BONE MARROW ENDED UP BEING RACHEL, WHO ERIC THOUGHT WAS HIS. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK WON’T HAPPEN AGAIN, MEANING, ONCE THIS CHILD GETS DEATHLY SICK, ERIC HAS NO CLUE THAT WHO HE THINKS IS HIS CHILD MAY NOT BE HIS, REMEMBER HE WAS THERE ONCE BEFORE, WHEN HE LEARNED THAT THE CHILD HE THOUGHT WAS HIS ENDED UP BEING RACHEL, REMEMBER, THE RESULTS IN THE SAFE WAS NEVER SWITCHED BY SLOAN, WHAT HAPPENS IF THE RESULTS THAT EJ HAD LOCKED UP IN IT MAY END UP SHOWING THAT HE IS THIS CHILD’S FATHER?
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by zodiacpisces1971.
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by zodiacpisces1971.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantCan anyone erase this, I had no clue it was posted twice.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantWhat makes you think that Eric won’t lose this baby, given for one thing is that all of his other three had perished & then learn that this child that he has with Sloan was stolen: I can’t see him putting it out there “I never knew” as an excuse. What about conspiracy, given that conspiracy in the past had Sonny fired from Titan, & they take it out on him when all of the other players back then got off, when they should have went down for it, because of their conspiracy allowed the perception to have Sonny thrown out of Titan & they got no backlash for it at all & Sonny did? The viewers saw for themselves that they knew the charges were bogus & the viewers saw all of the illegalities to create the perception of attempted murder & yet the continued with both of the stories. The illegalities that I brought up here had a so-called-detective to trespass to plant the cameras to get the footage.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantThe main reason as to why I have a feeling that this child with Eric & Sloan, the both of them will lose this child, especially with what Dimitri had told Leo & that Leo plans to tell Nicole about, so the question that I have is that if Eric is destined to be a dad, isn’t it a little odd that 3 children of his had went to the great beyond, so to speak, & that he ends up losing this one as well, for when Leo ends up telling Nicole what Dimitri had relayed to him. Especially with that phone call that Eric had gotten that panicked Sloan, once Eric had told her about. They are setting it up for Eric to lose this one the way he had lost the other 3, meaning, that he loses this child once he learns that it was stolen.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantThat’s exactly my point, dis dam boom Eric’s the daddy all because as to who she had slept with, given that EJ never donated anything, the reason being that it may have been any toothbrush in the DeMira house & that Eric never donated anything, did he & look 5 seconds later they label him the daddy all because process of elimination. not proving it, remember, even Eric never knew about the genetic testing did he, & that Sloan had swabbed herself, & then look what happened, 5 seconds later, the genetic testing showed that Eric’s the daddy, & did he know of that testing, NO. Remember Sloan swabbed her own self & it showed that Eric’s the daddy, now does that work, that 5 seconds after she swabbed herself, Eric’s the daddy?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantI’m saying that what went on in Greece with teenage Victor for Constantine to know of played out after Eric Richards left Salem & we are suppose to believe that Victor existed before Dr. Eric Richards came on in 1969 & that Victor came on in 1985 & they waited for 28 years later for JK’s Const to put it out there of Vic’s teenage years, showing to the viewers that the character doesn’t even know of the doctor that left 15 years before Victor first came on?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantI know that the baby’s DNA doesn’t match EJ’s, what I’m getting as that dis dam boom, they make Eric the daddy of Nikki’s not-so-dead child with him not donating anything, & did we see him donating anything to prove it? Yes, No, see what I’m getting at?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantWhat I’m trying to relay is that, yes, granted that Jada & Stephanie are not responsible, because they had no way of knowing that Everett was going to show up, but what I’m getting at is the perception of everything. It wouldn’t matter if they are or aren’t responsible, what would matter is that Jada is a cop, she should have done her homework, back in Seattle, she would have used her career to nail him, therefore, preventing him from coming to Salem. The same with Stephanie, she may not have any knowledge of Ev’s history with Jada, but still, she thinks that it’s wise to get involved with an ex, & then work with him, then pontificate Leo’s actions, & act like that the local newspaper is a conglomerate, by doing P.R. for the paper, & that with Everett writing Alice & Tom’s legacy & history, it’s that not far of a leap of him setting the fire, trapping Chad & his children, because Stephanie just had to show him her great-grandparents cornerstone.
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantIt does matter which characters came first, I.E. The assassin named Damon that Victor hired when JJ volunteered to babysit Ari for the Ambiguosly Gay Duo & Dr. Eric Richards, you tell me as to Victor’s teen-years played out in Greece with what Constantine had been bringing up to Maggie, you tell me as to how Victor preceded Dr. Eric Richards & you tell me as to how it doesn’t matter what characters came first?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantIt does matter which characters came first, I.E. The assassin named Damon that Victor hired when JJ volunteered to babysit Ari for the Ambiguosly Gay Duo & Dr. Eric Richards, you tell me as to Victor’s teen-years played out in Greece with what Constantine had been bringing up to Maggie, you tell me as to how Victor preceded Dr. Eric Richards & you tell me as to how it doesn’t matter what characters came first?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantI get as to why they wrote it, to play up what lengths she would go to, to show Johnny how much of a crush she has on him, but the crush came out of no-where, there’s no story to explain her having that kind of a crush on him, & with no story at all & it came from no-where, there’s a need to play it up, especially when she faces the repercussions of it as well, she wouldn’t face them at all, once they had ended the story, given that we saw it twice as to how the story ends, given Tate’s jealous reaction & giving the illusion of Tate’s crush on Holly, remember, that they never played up at all as to how Tate feels about Johnny, in order for him to agree in doing what Holly wants & with no hostility towards Johnny, why isn’t Tate letting Johnny to know of Holly’s plans?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantWhat makes you think that Holly will get pregnant any day now, given that Tate squashed her plans to destroy Chanel, by letting Chanel & Johnny in on his crush towards Holly. I can’t see that Tate would help Holly, given as to how he had reacted in her recruiting him to help her, what better way to stop her cold is by letting ChanelOnny to believe his blossoming crush on Holly. Think about it. Doesn’t Holly know that her step-daddy is the D.A. & that Chanel’s mommy is the Mayor, wouldn’t you think that would that would end Holly’s plans, given that there’s no story at all as to where he crush came from? Remember, Johnny was never depicted in the show for when she was on, now was he & yet there’s no story as to where the crush came from, right?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantI know that Chanel & Johnny doesn’t see this coming. The question that I have is, are they nixing the story at hand with how they have Tate acknowledging his crush on Holly, to end her the upcoming wrath on Chanel, because I can’t see Tate helping Holly with anything, given as to how jealous he had gotten that Holly wouldn’t give him the time of day until he agreed to help her, what better way to stop Holly’s wrath on Chanel is by stopping her by playing up his crush on her to halt her actions towards anyone, I.E. Chanel?
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantThe one that Sami had shot in the crotch was Paul Kersey’s Alan. I don’t know when Sami accused Austin of rape, but still, should this story have been written, because Holly knows that her step-father is the D.A., & she also knows that the young lady that she plans to destroy is the Mayor’s daughter, & who she wants to get into the pants of is Elvis’ son, you tell me should this story have been written? Think about it???
zodiacpisces1971ParticipantThis goes back to when Sami filed rape charges on Austin, I don’t know if she did or didn’t, but the problem that I have is that Sami wasn’t Holly’s age when she was with Austin, was she, she was when she was with Lucas, the question that I have with this is that Holly knows that the D.A. is now her stepfather, she knows that Paulina is the Mayor, she knows that Johnny is the D.A.’s son, she knows that Chanel is the Mayor’s daughter, & the writers think the story had to be written???WTF
-
AuthorPosts