Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 874 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CB (Camila Banus) Monstrous Bitch #59801
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    But what I’m getting at is that the character of Gabi is allowing her never seen daughter to go through her death, the many times she nearly lost her daddy Will, then the character is allowing her brother to go through her death, all because of what the actress wants, can you really see that the actress is allowing the show to do that to her character’s family?

    in reply to: Upcoming Events #59793
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    Then this, isn’t it very odd that the take-off of Dynasty is on tv in Salem when it has been 34 years after ABC ended the show & this show is on an NBC affiliate & also on tv in Salem was when the had the footage of Abe’s first Mayoral run?

    in reply to: Wedding Interuptus #59792
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    What I’m getting at is that we have to put up with the fall-out for 3-4 more months of what we are seeing lately that may induce dry heaving AD NAUSEUN. You really think that anyone would put up with this content for that long?

    in reply to: Wedding Interuptus #59789
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    The question that I have is this: This pertains to Megan & as well as to EJ. Even with the hostility between siblings, i.e. EJ, Kristen, Stefan, they certainly wouldn’t put into motion to kill off the other with what EJ had brought up to Megan. This pertains to Johnny & the relationship he had with Stefano, who he once called Nonno, with Stefano’s relationship to Johnny, I kind of doubt that he would have allowed one of his daughters to kill any of his sons, now would he? Especially, a son he never knew he had or a history with for that matter. I can’t see Gabi will be gone in the fall, because the actions are about to be put into motion now, with Megan & Li at the helm, can you imagine the backlash the show would get in having the upcoming turn of events being played out for 3 to 4 to 5 months from now?

    in reply to: Upcoming Events #59784
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    Then this, they even had Dimitri bringing up who his father is. Get this, Oskar von Leuschner, when the only von Leuschners are Carly Manning & her brother Frankie, the other two are Alamains, Laurence & Leopold, I might add. The third one was G’Vera’s Henri von Leuschner, he was only seen in flashbacks, I can’t see how Oskar was in those flashbacks with G’Vera’s Henri, given as to when the writers wrote up the story for Dimitri to bring up, you tell me how we are to believe that this show will last for two more years, given with the content that we are seeing?

    in reply to: Commentary for June 9 2023 #59780
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    Harris was telling Kate at Roman’s pub when she hired him to kill whoever, but when he brought up as to where he’s living was when he brought up who once owned his place of residence now, that was when he brought up his parents’ residence. But they have never brought up at all as to how Dimitri is a Von Leuschner, now have they? Yes, Megan was given the name of Hathaway by who had adopted her, & that she brought up marrying his father. Remember, we still don’t know who his father is, now do we? Remember, Henri, last played by G’Vera, his Henri was only seen in flashbacks, I can’t see in those flashbacks of him marrying & knocking up Megan who was presumed dead at that time & that the only other Von Leuschners are Carly Manning & Frankie, we know that Henri is their father, Carly & Frankie never had any other siblings with that name, in order for one of them to have a son, that being Dimitri. Right. Remember, Lawrence & Leopold, the both of them are Alamains, not Von Leuschner, now are they? Then this, what happens if something goes wrong & someone makes sure that the wedding of Dimitri & Gwen doesn’t take place, remember, Gwen & Xander’s nups never took place, much less Craig & Leo’s nups, so you tell me as to how nothing is going to go wrong & makes sure that the wedding happens?

    in reply to: Eric, Nicole, EJ #59771
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    What we are seeing out of Eric is that he always is defending Sloan every way he can, all because he was once a priest, so he sees the best in her, even with what he’s suspicious when it comes to her. Yes, granted, Sloan is in the clear legally, but it doesn’t negate as to what she had done before she was cleared legally or not, does it? He knows very well as to what Nicole had done with Xander when he went of to to GOD’s work, so to speak, why is he so willing to allow Sloan to do the same thing instead of defending her every 2 seconds?

    in reply to: Same Old, Same Old #59763
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    Peter Porte who is on this show, played a psychopath not only on Young & The Restless, he also played a psychopath when he was in league with Drew Donovan on Beyond Salem (the first season) & now he plays another psychopath when he is now in league with his mother, Megan Hathaway. What I’m getting at is that with how many times PP had played a psychopath, you tell me how SAME OLD, SAME OLD, doesn’t apply here, no matter what other soap is shown on another network or not?

    in reply to: EJ: A New Father #59758
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    If this child is his, remember Colin. He believes that his sister turned her back on him. You wanna bet that he would go after this child, & kill it, all because he believes that his sister turned her back on him, & look where Sloan is with this baby daddy story, it wouldn’t be the first time this happened, Sloan was the one who pointed it out there that Colin is no monster, yeah, right, if he’s no monster then why did he have mother & daughter Price to meet their death on the roof. What’s wrong with Sloan, her brother nearly clobbered Abe to death, about to throw mother & daughter off the roof & Sloan’s pontificating her brother. So what I’m getting at is that EJ has to stay the baby’s father, it’s the only way to prevent Colin from going after the baby because his sister is in this story.

    in reply to: EJ: A New Father #59755
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    The question is why Sloan took that risk & went behind Eric’s back, when she knew that he would be done with her in a heartbeat once he learns that she had done this?

    in reply to: Colin & Leo #59748
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    But what I’m getting is that this Nurse that Kim Coles is playing isn’t the focal point, the focal point is Colin & his mental state, when he learned that he was recognized & that Leo put it together, Colin leaves a witness alive, the Colin that I know of wouldn’t have done that, now would he? Remember, there was a need for Lani’s birthfather had killed an addict & gave the allusion that the addict had shot Eli, didn’t he, so doesn’t that put the question in place as to why Leo stayed alive?

    in reply to: Bonnie Kiriakis Is Adrienne Kiriakis #59747
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    I hope you do see what I’m getting at when it comes to different characters that they are trying to give the same backstory to, like when it was put out there that Mimi had killed her father, the exact same thing in a way when it comes to Adrienne’s son-in-law, when he shot EJ., so the question arises why they are playing everything Adrienne to Bonnie. Remember, they did have when Bonnie tried to win over StevAyla & when Justin first handed a handkerchief for when he first met Adrienne, that happened didn’t it?

    in reply to: Colin & Leo #59737
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    To me this nurse who kidnapped Abe isn’t the focal point. If Colin just wanted to get away & not be bothered by a hostage or harming someone, but yet he takes it out on Chanel & Paulina, remember, it was brought up that with Leo recognizing him, & put it together as to who Colin is, it’s unlikely that he would leave Leo alive, especially with how he wouldn’t leave a witness alive, now would he?

    in reply to: Bonnie Kiriakis Is Adrienne Kiriakis #59736
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    I’m talking about the “CHARACTER”‘s characteristics, not the performer. How again are nails. hair & clothing have anything to do with the story. No matter what the story is, should nails, hair & clothing matter to the story? I say no. Because hair, nails & clothing aren’t the focal point, the focal point of the story matters not the cosmetics of the character. But the physicality of the character’s characteristics are when you are dealing with two characters who are completely different from each other, & yet again, they keep at it. Everything Bonnie went through is Adrienne connected. Like for instance when Bonnie had put it out there as to what Mimi had done to her father, the same thing happened to Adrienne, it’s too reminiscent of what Adrienne’s son-in-law did to EJ. That’s what I’m getting at. So you tell me as to how “CHARACTER”‘S physicality should be off limits?

    in reply to: Bonnie Kiriakis Is Adrienne Kiriakis #59733
    zodiacpisces1971
    Participant

    All I’m getting at is that both characters, Adrienne & Bonnie have different girths, it was their girths that separated them, meaning, showing how different they are, so wouldn’t you think that a vast girth change & the other character’s hairdo, & giving another character’s back history to the other is questionable as to who the other is, given how their stories to different characters are symmetrical to each other?

    I wasn’t making derogatory judgements when it comes to girth, was I ? & If I was, I’m sorry.

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 874 total)