Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
EJ better be the father of this child. The reason is because, once this child ends up being EJ’s child, the child would have shares of the family business, with EJ’s connections he can reverse the immunity on Dimitri & Megan if they rule in favor with Gabi & Stefan if they don’t align themselves up with EJ. So is there a chance of that happening?
But what I’m getting at is that it was 33 years ago as to when the patriarch of the Von Leuschner family was seen & he was seen in flashbacks, I kind of doubt that a von Leuschner in flashbacks showed him knocking up Megan, don’t you think, given as to when Frankie was 1986 & Max was seen July of 1986, remember, Frankie & Max were on when everyone believed that Megan was presumed to be dead & that 1984-1985. So you tell me as to how any von Leuschner had knocked up dear old Megan Hathwayosaurus?
When Eric had put it out there to Sloan, the keyword is “ANYTHING” & if she keeps “ANYTHING” from him, they are done, can you really see Sloan using Nicole’s pregnancy as a weapon against her by threatening to tell Eric about the suppose motherhood & then having Eric learn that Sloan did in fact keep it quiet from him?
I’m not saying that Tripp held hostage was faked, what I’m getting at is that the photo of him held hostage is what put Ava in the position to do what she did to Susan. What I’m getting at is that when Andrew had seen the faked photo of Paul held hostage lured Andrew to the trap, meaning, allowing Andrew to fall for it that led to his actions being abducted, & the reason as to why it’s reminiscent of what Ava had seen is because, her actions costed Susan her life, & Andrew’s actions led to his abduction, that’s what I’m getting at. What I’m getting at is that a trained ISA Agent couldn’t tell that it was faked, would have prevented his abduction, once he had used his training to deduce that it was faked, don’t you think?
Can you really see Sloan doing that, given as to what she would lose, given that she kept the pregnancy a secret from him, when he had put out there that no matter what she’s keeping quiet, that he would end things with her once he learns that she knew of the pregnancy & kept that a secret from him?
Here’s the difference, the patriarch of the Von Leuschner family was only shown in flashbacks, I kind of doubt that in the flashbacks shows Ivan G’Vera’s Henri knocking Megan up, now did he?
In a way don’t think that Nicole is hiding the truth from Eric, the reason is because she wants to make as to who’s the father & then find out if she can carry it to term. So to mean what Nicole is doing is the right thing, because she wants to be sure that she can carry the child & learning who the father is, but the problem that I have with this whole story is that, yes, they have Johnny’s love life, the story ended when it came to ColnAlia & that Gabi & Stefan legalized their divorce. But what I’m getting at is that why are they solely acting on Nicole’s impending baby, no one cares about it anymore. Then there’s this, by having Dimitri, Kristen & Megan moving in it plays up in many ways of how Nicole could lose this child. So why have that in play, & then have either EJ or Eric to learn that both could be the babydaddy & then learn the old & the new DiMeras costed both of them ( EJ & Eric respectively) that thanks to one of their own & two more moving in caused the miscarriage, given the miscarriages that Nicole had brought up?
I do believe that Nicole’s child is EJ’s. Look at it this way, Eric lost a child when everyone thought that Will had killed Adrienne, when Mickey died by way of that accident, Rachel who was newly born was given to Sarah. Then when they had Nicole end up having a baby, with how Nicole had brought up miscarriages that she once had before, & couldn’t carry a child to term & with what was laced into those biscuits could end up killing this baby, don’t you think? So if Eric’s the father of this baby, what was in those biscuits could end up killing another child of Eric’s. By having this child she’s now carrying being EJ’s child, this child would be entitled to DeMira shares, that could easily defeat Gabi & Stefan, & with the act of kidnapping, I can’t see as to how Megan would be in position to give her shares to Gabi & Stefan & the same with Dimitri, he would be in no position give his shares of DeMira to Gabi & Stefan, because both he & Megan are domesticate terrorists, given as to what Megan had done to Kate, Kayla & Marlena & holding Kate hostage would hardly have their shares to be given to anyone, i.e. Gabi & Stefan, don’t you think?
You tell me, don’t you think that GabFan should start losing, like for instance, when EJ had the content of Gabi cheating on Li, with Stefan, & then it turns out that it’s of no use anymore, then they have Gabi & Stefan sabotaging Nicole’s review of Stefan, & with Dimitri, Kristen & Megan coming back home, some how Gabi & Stefan, once yet again defeats EJ by way of Megan’s help, given as to why both GabFan celebrates at the end of this week. Don’t you think that it’s about time that what should backfire on them should be in play?
YOU DON’T, when Rafe had put it out there of Colin’s 5 year old British Crime wave, when the character was concepted a year ago? Then this: When the curio owner that made the key to the Hunter apartment recognized Talia’s photo, the key worked in the Hunter keyhole, but yet Paulina’s office was trashed back in March, when Colin was first seen a month & 16 days later??? ARE YOU BLIND
But still why the need to get the content & deem it useless, allowing yet again having Gabi & Stefan win again, that’s exactly why James Scott left Days & refused to go back, so I can’t see as to why the writers would allow Feuerriegel to strike against them, in allowing CB & BB’s GabFan to win at all costs? Remember, MW & PP’s Megan & Dimitri, they have lost more than once, & yet think that the will win yet again, when they have no clue that their actions to get immunity, would backfire, given the act to get it, don’t you think that BB & CB’s StefAbi should start to lose?
I know that the whole show is fiction, but is that really the case, given how Helen Keller can even spot the massive holes in the end result? I’m not saying that this show is reality tv at all, but they do have to stop putting in massive holes that even Helen Keller can see, don’t you think?
But remember, Gabi didn’t sign the divorce papers, did she, so she’s still legally married to Li, is she not, & plus, remember, Gabi is still legally Wei’s daughter-in-law, is she not, so with Wei having no knowledge of his daughter-in-law’s infidelity & that he doesn’t know at all that Stefan was presumed dead for 4 years & how many times his brain was fried, you tell me as to how no one has any power over either one them, much less both? I have read that Dimitry, Kristen & Megan end up moving back into the DeMira household yet again. I also have read that John & Paul will end up learning that Dimitri & Megan had abducted Andrew Donovan, may I remind you that the act of kidnapping, can’t grant them immunity, given their act on an ISA Agent, so what makes them think that they will get it, given how more than once that they had lost?
How can we assume that Talia had the key made to Jada’s apartment, she had two made, Paulina’s trashed office occurred in March, they waited two months & 19 days later for Paulina to learn that it was Colin that done the trashing, so you tell me how he could he have trashed Paulina’s office, left, & then wait a month & 16 days for the viewers first sight of him & then wait 10 days later for him to show up in Salem & then 23 days later of Paulina to put it together as to who did the trashing? How did Talia come up with an explanation of just having it made to cover he tracks, when they guy who made it identified Talia.
The main reason as to why the Spain trip is bullshit, is because the furtile minds of the writers didn’t even have the concept of either one of them before they wrote the story of the Spain trip that Colin had put out there, now did they?
I get that his British crime spree is a part of his backstory, what I’m getting at is that Rafe gave the illusion as to when the British crime spree took place, before the furtile minds of the writing team concepted the character.
Then this: when the characters are mash ups of Hollywood Couples, you think that what a character puts out there of his or her backstory, makes the backstory, TRUE? When you see mash ups of fictional characters, you believe the backstory, in my eyes: NO!
