Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Are you telling me, that you are that blind that they are giving past histories of characters to new ones, meaning, I get that Bonnie isn’t exactly a new character, but still they did mirror Adrienne’s history, i.e. Ad’s rape by her daddy, Bonnie’s rape by her late husband’s brother, then having Mimi killing her daddy, yes, granted Will didn’t kill EJ, but still he did shoot him in the head & that’s the same story with Bonnie & Calista, where Calista ending up shooting herself when she tried to kill Bonnie. You see what I’m getting at now?
Carlivati & his team need to remember this: Think of it this way, If Eric is really the bio-daddy of Jude, then why show to the viewers the actions that Sloan & Trask had done, if Eric was really the father, wouldn’t you think that it pontificates Sloan’s & Trask’s actions because they never face the repercussions for it, then that means that Paulina will never know of Sloan & Trask’s actions, now would she? I can’t see Gabi returning to Salem, because she’s not CB & look at what happened to GW’s Will, all because he wasn’t CM. Then this: Alex has to stay Victor’s son, PERIOD: END OF STORY, the reason is because it would allow him to learn of Maggie’s scheme to take down Constantine, don’t you think that it’s odd that they play out of John supposedly being Konst’s programming, Konst burning the fake pre-nup & Maggie having the real one & having Konst going down for misappropriating funds & then not use it? By exposing Konst & Theresa’s scheme by having Xander to be Vic’s son, Tate would learn how much of a monster his mommy is & look at what she had inflicted on herself when Tate was put where, do you really think that Theresa would do that to her own son, especially given that it was Theresa who told her son as to why Tate’s daddy wasn’t in his life.
I know that it’s a soap opera, but that has nothing to do with it. All I’m getting at is that you don’t give other characters’ back histories to new ones & play that narrative or those narratives out there to be put into motion, think about it. Look at Abigail: When she killed Andre, she was Abigail when she did it, & when she saw what she did, she developed her grandmother’s persona to clean things up for her, then whatever caused her to split into the Gabi alter, she knocked out Kate, Marlena & Vivian & Stefan locked all three of them up. You don’t give what Abigail went through to Everett. The reason is because we don’t know the story as to why he went into the Bobby Stein alter, now do we & how exactly is the Bobby Stein alter, the alter, when Bobby’s name coincides with the guest host body, i.e. Robert Everett Stein & that they have played up that Bobby’s prints are on one hand & on the other, Everett’s prints, would hardly give him the D.I.D., now would it? The same with Calista. look at all what of what Adrienne went through, you tell me as to why it was necessary to give Ad’s backstory to Bonnie & all because two totally different characters are played by the same actress. With them being two vastly different characters, you don’t give either one of them parallel backstories, you give one of them different backstories. Right?
I’m not saying that Roman is Chris Kositchek, I’m not saying that Alex is Ben. What I’m getting at is the character of Everett, the character of Bobby Stein wasn’t conceived yet, in order for him to have an abusive past, it’s like what they did with Bonnie. They gave Adrienne’s life to Bonnie, & what Nick put Will through, i.e. as to what Calista had on Bonnie. Then they played up that Calista’s husband was about to rape Bonnie, the same way that Adrienne’s dad tried to rape her, then playing up that Bonnie telling Lucas that Mimi killed her father, yes, granted that Will didn’t kill EJ, but he did shoot him in the head, didn’t he? Then what Nick had on Will that had Nick to get custody of Ari, is what Calista played on Bonnie. What I’m getting at is that, they are allowing past histories of past characters to affect characters that never faced that, because they weren’t created then, no were they?
But what I’m getting at is that with how Nick Fallon was raped in prison, & Everett saw how a combative, sloshed Sloan was with her husband, you tell me as to how & why Bobby Stein emerged to hit Eric, when he thought that Eric was inflicting bodily harm to Sloan, when we know of what happened to Nick in prison, i.e. the rapes by Jensen. I can’t see as to how Bobby slash Everett was inflicted with physical abuse before the character was conceived, don’t you think?
I’m talking about Days of Our Lives reality. It has been established that Everett Lynch shares more than DNA with Bobby. They both have an actual name in common. Robert Everett Stein. Interestingly, their fingerprints also match, meaning the prints of Bobby’s also match with Everett’s as well. I can see you believe that he isn’t Nick Fallon. But think for a minute, it has been established that both Abigail DiMera & Jessica Blake did have D.I.D. as well, & with how Nick, not only was he raped in prison where he was raped by Jensen & Jensen being Will’s shooter, Nick was pushed into an icy grave, he was shot 5 times, with Nick being raped, you tell me as to how he was not reminded of those rapes when he saw how combative, sloshed Sloan was with her husband?
Then explain Bobby’s prints on one hand & Everett’s prints on the other hand? remember Nick Fallon. He was raped in prison by Will’s shooter, Jensen, so he resorted to the Nick Fallon alter when he saw Sloan’s refusal & thinking that Eric was trying to take her away when she kept telling Eric, NO. that’s what brought out the rape memories, if Bobby Stein is the real person, then how come Chad made it known about loving Everett’s work long before anyone knew that Bobby & Everett were one in the same & how come it brought up as to what Nick faced from Jensen when they were in prison together?
actually it isn’t getting interesting at all. Because when they had played up Abigail having D.I.D., did she have three hands, meaning, one having Gabi’s prints, the second having Laura’s prints & the third having Abs’ prints. NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
D.I.D. worked on One Life to Live. On that sudser, Jessica suffered from it, because she was raped when Niki Smith took her out at night & that what prompted the alters, Tess, & Wes & also it also affected Viki as well, she was raped by her own father & that produced Tommy, Princess, Jean Randolph, Niki Smith.
So you tell me as to how it’s D.I.D. here? This is the first time that Marlena deals with this, because when it comes to Everett Lynch, on one hand has Everett’s prints & Bobby Stein’s prints on the other, you tell me is this the right way to play this up?
But is Li, Will Horton, is Li, Stefano: AKA: The Phoenix, is Li belonging to The Hortons, The Brady’s, The Kiriakis’, The DiMeras, The Johnsons: NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I can’t see EJ being behind it either given that given that he was D.A. at the time, do you really think that they will allow the D.A. to be at the crime scene, then this: do you really think that Li would put his sister & their parents through this? Then this: If he really isn’t dead at all & he’s not staying that way, I kind of doubt that it would be written to have the killing of Li to be reopened, if he’s not staying dead, now would they. I’m not buying that Gil had killed Li given that Ava had killed Gil before Li was knifed, given that Gil was never apart of the shares-rumored-to-be-phony-giving-Stabi-motive, now was he?
that is if Gabi gets out of prison, given that Stefan wants to allow Clyde to have his wife murdered by his prison minions, if he gets wind that his bloodied book has Gil’s prints on it & yet, not once are we seeing as to how who put Gil’s prints on it, now have we? Then they think that Li’s murder case can be reopened, given that not once have they proven who handled the weapon at the time of the murder, all because Gabi’s prints ended up on it after the murder. To me, both Gabi & Stefan have motive to kill Li, because when Gabi was at the door when Li made the call to Stefan that his shares were phoney, Gabi enters, she picks up the knife & stabs Li in the back with it. Then when Stefan shows up to find his wife with the knife in her hand, he sees her being taken into custody, he covers for his wife by leaving Gil’s prints all over the book belonging to Clyde, takes it away from the crime scene so Harris can find it, therefore, once they learn that Gil’s prints are on the book. Stefan breathes a sigh of relief by saying to himself: ” Thank God, they bought it, none of them know that my wife & I murdered Li.”
The reason as to why Gabi was convicted was because CB left the show & that she was moving to Florida. Look at it this way, when CM & ZT were let go, they put the story in motion for Will had gotten a movie job in New Zealand & this was back when Kate, Kayla & Marlena was abducted by Megan & Will had met up with Sonny in the Square & they went Down Under, as it were, with Will still in his tux. So the question that I have is this with them having Cherie Jiminez playing the new Gabi & given that she’s no CB, as it were, she isn’t exactly going to stay amongst the living, especially given that they put Will’s murder in place because GW wasn’t CM, now was he?
If there is nothing indicating that he had been let go at all, & that it came from the actor himself, then wouldn’t you think that they would have to play up the story for Tony’s family to learn of his fate, I can’t see that happening if he wasn’t let go, right?
All I’m getting at is that with it being necessary to John’s actions in one narrative, it’s always wise to show the actions of another in another narrative. Meaning, when we saw the narrative of Sonny Kiriakis returning a baseball to Paul, did or didn’t we see Will having relations with Paul, so why not show Theresa using the pen in her narrative, given that we saw John’s actions in another narrative?
When we saw John’s actions in keeping the real prenup & putting a fake one in the safe for Konst to burn, then, yes, we need to see a pen moving by Theresa. Think about it, we see John’s actions but yet they think that its wise that we don’t see a pen being used by anyone? You see how that narrative doesn’t work, one narrative was shown & they refuse to allow the viewers to see the actions of another narrative, isn’t that like saying putting the cart before the horse, as it were. Meaning, that they allow us to see John’s actions but we don’t see a pen being used by anyone?
But when they played up the flashback as to where John had stolen the real prenup & put a fake one in its place, did we see any pen moving in Theresa’s flashback to show that a pen was moving by her hand: NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! With seeing the footage of John stealing the real prenup & put a fake in place, explain as to why we never saw a pen moving by Theresa’s hand. I don’t believe for one minute any actress would step into the role of Konst’s ex & that she’s Xander’s mother that Vic had dalliances with for Xander to be his son. Think about it, yet again, if Konst’s ex had dalliances with Victor in order to produce Xander, that means that Konst would be Xander’s stepfather, if Xandy’s mommy was still married to Konst at the time she had dalliances with Victor, right? Then this: Yet again, they create characters that were never concepted back then in order for Konst’s ex to show herself, is it more likely that Konst’s ex may end up being Diana Colville, remember, by bringing up that she might be from Bold & The Beautiful & or Y&R, JC plays Gloria on Y&R, doesn’t she & its known she’s coming back to Salem, so could it be that Diana might be Konst’s ex & Xandy’s mommy, because GH did play up that Blair Kramer was Martin’s ex-wife.
