Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Isn’t a little conflict of interest, given that Stephanie’s HR firm had taken Chad on as an employee, yet they make out, get drunk & then were about to go to bed with each other, it may not have happened, but still, they were going there & also because Stephanie’s HR firm is apart of Titan, given as to who’s funding the Gubenatorial run is Titan, in which Alex is the Interim CEO of & yet, someone approves of Alex calling Stephanie out on it, given Alex’s feelings towards Stephanie?
When Rebecca Budig was on GH as Hayden Barnes, she crippled a character that her ex-husband was blackmailing her on, but, she was playing Greenlee Smythe on AMC way before the character of Hayden Barnes was created for GH, the same here. Meaning, Chanel wasn’t even an idea to create & we are suppose to believe what she had done in College, she actually did, given as to what Will went through with Adrienne, it turned out that it was Evan & Orpheus who had done it. Think about it, it’s the same story when Jake was on at the time that they had Abe’s shooting, it turned out that Jake never killed anyone in Philly & we are suppose to believe that Chanel did this?
Then with Alex being the interim CEO at Titan, & that he participated in a threesome with Allie & Chanel, wouldn’t what Chanel had supposedly had done in College destroy Titan, given that it would be a scandal for Titan because as to she had slept with was the CEO of Titan?
Couple of folds: Yes, Stephanie has her own PR firm, & yes, she was hired by Titan to do their PR, & she was hired by Paulina to run her campaign & yes, Steph may have hired Chad, but with Stephanie being an “employee” at Titan, should she fall for Chad given that with her being an employee at Titan & that Chad was hired by her own firm, meaning, that her own firm & Titan are competitors, therefore, a conflict of interest, don’t you think?
This goes to Sloan. What makes anyone think what Chanel had done in college was actually done by her, given that once again that there’s no story at all as to how Sloan got wind of Chanel’s college antics & given where it supposedly took place would hardly be relevant in Salem, now would it, given that it would destroy Paulina’s Gubernatorial run of her last place of residence, remember, anyone who is campaigning for any political office, would take place in there last place of residence, not where she isn’t a resident of, meaning, marrying into the state that isn’t her last place residence.
With how Alex is interim CEO of Titan & what Chanel had supposedly done in College, would cause a scandal to Titan & then if it comes out when it comes to the three-some with Allie & Chanel, it would be another scandal to Titan, because as to who was one of the parties in the three-some & her college antics would have two scandals involving Titan, & then a third scandal, given the parties involved in the campaign would be guilty of conspiracy & you tell me was the three-some needed?
Chad was never hired by Titan, all he did was lend a helping hand. But still, look as to what Chad did with Kate, Leo, Ted & Vivian. He allowed the lawsuit against Sonny to take place, meaning, the sexual harassment against Sonny. Once Chad & Stephanie learns from Paulina as to what Sloan has on Chanel, & they put into motion to cover it up would be disastrous to Titan because of the conspiracy. Then there’s this with Alex & Ambiguous Bi-Couple, meaning, the threesome, let’s hope it doesn’t go there, but if does, Alex would bring a sex scandal once again to Titan, & then if the threesome does happen, Sloan would end up getting the video of the threesome & what she has on Chanel & gives to the Salem Spectator, can you imagine the fall-out of that?
I can’t see many deaths happen to the rest of the characters, because this show is hanging on for dear life, would there even be a show, given the backlash would have if they kill off Kate, Kayla & Marlena. HEAVEN FORBID, as to what would happen if they kill off these characters.
So the question that I have. With how he had brought up firing Stephanie is the wrong move on many levels, that he’s willing to throw a sex scandal to topple the family business & allowing his brother to take the fall, given that one of them is the Interim CEO & the other is the CEO. Then this will also allow Sloan to take photos, or as well have a video of the threesome to be shown in order to end Paulina’s Gubernatorial run, given as to what she has on Chanel. One, the sex scandal video & then sending what she has to the Salem Spectator as to what she has on Chanel. Knowing this show they will never show as to how Sloan knows as to what Chanel has allegedly to have done & that would also diminish the viewership of this show, no matter as to how they are able to see this schlock.
The other question relates to Alex. & as well to Chad & Stephanie. 2 seconds after Abby left Chad at the cemetary, dis dam bang, he had no qualms at all over hand-holding with Stephanie & that is what Alex walked in on, once he saw hand-holding, boom, he made a bee-line to Allie & Chanel’s door-step, hinting the threesome being in play, when he had already had told his brother that firing Stephanie is out of line, but he doesn’t see as to what the threesome would cause to Titan, given that he’s the interim CEO at Titan, yes, granted Allie & Chanel are not employees at Titan, but still, there would be a sex scandal involving the interim CEO, given as to what transpired between, Leo & Sonny. So, the question is why Alex is so willing to cause another sex scandal that would cripple Titan, given as to what position he has with Titan, was where his brother was when it came to Leo. I know that Allie & Chanel are not employees, but still, his position with Titan would put him in the position to get fired, because as to who Allie is to Sonny. With how Massey is on retainer, meaning, coming & going, can you imagine what he would to his brother-in-law once he learns of the threesome involving Alex & his sister. Talk about going ballistic, don’t you think?
The question that I have is this: I get that Chanel is fiery & bubbly & filled with effervescence, but still, she doesn’t need to be involved in a three-way just to prove it to Allie. I hope that Chanel leaves Allie cold & alone, because to Chanel, she sees that Allie is in a way acting like Will, some time ago, he had put it out there that after he married Sonny & that he had gotten that L.A. job offer, he had said that he doesn’t want to have a boring life in Salem. That’s exactly what Allie is saying to Chanel, she sees her life with Chanel boring, she doesn’t want the life with Chanel that Will has with Sonny, she keeps making it about herself & wanting Chanel to stay with her & will do anything to make that happen. She’s trying to breathe life in a relationship that’s failing. So the question that I have is this: This is the main problem with the bi-sexual lifestyle they don’t want a stable life with anyone, they think that it’s a-okay to cheat on whoever they are with because they don’t want stability. So is it so wise to play that up on here?
Allie is a dour sourpuss, there’s nothing in her that anyone wants to see. So why is she needed?
The question that I have is why the need for closure when it came to Leo & Craig & Nancy & Mike. What I mean is that with what went down with the Wesleys & Mike is over & done with & how long Mike has been gone for & how very little as to what he knows now, you tell me, does it matter now, when it comes to Nancy & Mike, given that Mike isn’t staying & the same with Leo & Craig. Don’t you think that there should be closure between Leo & Chad & as well with Leo & Sonny, yes, granted it’s known as to what Clyde had done, but still, look as to what Leo had done to Sonny with the harassment charges & the attempted murder charges & the content sent to Will, there’s no hashing that out with Sonny, now is there & they do this with Craig & Leo & Nancy & Mike given what went down with the 4 of them is over & done with?
With how long Weiss hasn’t been seen acting wise, how would he be too expensive?. I know that the last time Mike was seen on camera was when Roark played the role, but should it negate Weiss’s Mike?
I understand that the reason Roark’s Mike is back to hash things out with Nancy, but what I’m getting at is that isn’t it futile for them to hash things out now, given, that all the Wesleys did to him then, that he too is blame, once he hadn’t been shagging that upcoming nurse back then, would she have been talked into by Craig to file the charges, given that Mike didn’t even know that nurse was on the list of new hirees, then with how Mike & Jennifer are leaving this week & so is Craig, why waste with dead air by hashing anything out, given that it’s over & done with, especially, with Mike doesn’t even know about the damage that Clyde did to Nancy is there a need to crush her even more with what she did when is over & done with?
Don’t you think that it’s very odd that Clyde has alluded to Alex as his sonny-boy, in his Deliverance lingo, given that RSW had played his son, & then bringing up that after Sonny was stabbed, that he was found in his office & then that it was played up about Alex bringing up the question to Sonny, ” Are you serious “, given that Stephanie is an employee at Titan & that Alex is Interim CEO at Titan. Do you really think that there is going to be a murder mystery over Clyde’s murder, given whoever had done it would be pontificated for it & given the key to the city, so wouldn’t you think that it would be considered waste of dead air, given Clyde’s actions lately?
This goes to Jada Hunter & Sarah Horton. When Sarah had brought up that she attended Jada’s 8th birthday party. Marcus Hunter, Jada’s dad left town in 1992. The writers now, when Jada showed herself to Kayla & Steve, the both of them brought up that they were saddened over Marcus’ death. MAJOR GOOF: The character never died, only the actor, Richard Biggs did, don’t you think that it’s very odd that the writers have the characters reference to the actor’s death, when the character left town 30 years ago & waited 30 years later to put it out there of the character’s death?
It’s also odd that not once did any member of Marcus’ family contacted anyone in order for anyone to know of Marcus’ daughter, don’t you think?
Yes, Clyde admitted to stabbing Sonny, but still, he still thought that Alex looked like his son. Then they keep bringing up Ben every chance they can get, when Clyde mistook Alex for Ben, Abby at the cemetery with Chad, bringing Ben up to him, & remember, when Clyde did stab Sonny, Sonny was in front of the filing cabinet, & yet, when Leo found his body in his office, indicating the body was moved & we didn’t see Clyde moving Sonny’s body, now did we?
Then this: With how Ben had put in with every effort in him & with Marlena’s help to the point where he survived his childhood & he had left Salem with his wife & child, why give the illusion that Ben did it given how long he has been gone for?
Then this: When Stephanie became an addition & became an employee at Titan, with Sonny in the CEO position & Alex was made interim CEO, with Sonny sidelined, Alex was the one who had put it out there to Sonny pre-stabbing, “You were serious”, what better way to get Sonny out of the way because Sonny was dictating Alex’s love life is by helping Clyde. Yes, I know that Clyde confessed to stabbing Sonny, but remember, all we had gotten from Sonny is a blurred image & dis dang boom, he said it was Clyde, when the blurred image would have Sonny two people for each other.
Can you imagine, with Clyde alive & if he stands trial, Clyde’s lawyer would make mincemeat out of Sonny by getting Leo to bring up the seduction plot of Sonny’s when he & Will tried to convince Chad to do to Leo is what put Abby’s murder into play. Remember, when Sonny put his plan into motion, is what led Brady to tell him about Jackie Cox & put into motion for Craig to learn who he was marrying is a bigamist & that was the catalyst to put the murder of Abby into motion, without Sonny’s plan, there wouldn’t be any need for the events to fall into line that led to Clyde’s killing Abigail.
I just want to put it out there that every chance they keep bringing Ben every chance they can get given with how long Ben had been gone for & who looks like Ben to Clyde, Alex.
Clyde’s Deliverance mentality has him knowing how to alter a time stamp.
When Miguel, EJ’s muscle had shot him, Miguel had shot EJ, not Clyde.
When Chad exploded at the police station after hearing of what EJ had told him, how could Clyde have heard it between Belle & EJ?
With Lucas coming in by way of the French doors, & that he thought he saw Sarah leaving, the front door was locked from the inside & yet, Clyde walked right into the house?
I think that the reason as to why Sonny was stabbed was because of Leo’s animosity when he learned that Sonny had Chad to seduce him, but all of what Leo did was rendering Sonny unconscious, stripped him & took him to bed & sent the content to Will, there was no violence taken out on Sonny, so why frame Leo for the stabbing when he never resorted to violence over Sonny?
Clyde has the knowledge to alter a time stamp when he didn’t even know he was being recorded is a joke.
EJ’s muscle shot EJ, not Clyde.
8 years ago when EJ’s shooting took place before the explosion, so Feurriegel tapes & blocks the scenes as EJ before 90 percent of his body was burned from the aforementioned explosion, is also a joke, given that JS played the role then.
With how EJ had told Chad at the police station as to what he was keeping quiet & what he had said caused Chad to explode into anger, there was no way for Clyde to hear as to what EJ was saying to Belle, now was there?
With how the door was locked from the inside, according to Lucas’ recollection & that he had seen Gwen’s Sarah leaving, the door could have locked on it’s own & yet Clyde just walks in on the night of Abs’ killing. Is laughable, don’t you think.
With how Leo had given Clyde the jewels to put into the Brady Pub safe, there’s a need for Clyde to be in the house for him to kill Abby?
This is the topper: With how Justin had brought up his son’s 7 year old stabbing, was there a need for it to happen twice, given the reflection he might have seen at Titan could have been Craig, given of how blurred it was & it let him to now think that reflection was Clyde, is also laughable.
Also, given that all Craig had brought up was hearing of the list & deducing who was on it, but he has no clue of the weapon.
This does go to Kristen, this is also about Chloe, with family court being family court, isn’t very odd that content on a flash drive is admissible in family court when it came to Brady winning custody?
This involves Orpheus. with how Orpheus feels about JarLena, PatchAyla, & RomAte, with John being Brady’s dad & the was questioned to defend his son in getting custody. Brady should have lost, based on the fact that with Kristen bringing up Brady & the attempted killing of Phillip, why didn’t she bring up as to what Orpheus & Evan had done to Maggie, given that it led to Sarah’s dead child, so by giving Brady custody would allow Orpheus to go after Rachel, now wouldn’t he?
Did you read the synopsis: Craig brought this up. He brought up that he had heard about Leo’s list & deduced that Brady & Chloe were on the list. Meaning, he only knew of the list, not the weapon. Then he brought up that in a way it is his fault, because he failed to listen to others warnings about Leo. So the question that I have is why bring up as to what he failed to listen to & then go around & have him to be seen as the killer, given that he was the one who brought up as to what he failed to listen to from who?
Yes, Craig may have the vanilla scent on him, that Chad had smelled when he accidentally ran into Clyde, Craig & Nancy, but remember this: With him failing to know about the weapon, you really think that he took the weapon to Titan’s offices & used it on Sonny, given that it was Sonny who tried to warn Craig about who?
Remember, 5 seconds after Sonny’s promotion, Leo learned of it. That was when he plotted to take it out on Sonny, by rendering him unconscious & stripping him & then sent the content to Will, do you really think that without Leo’s actions, that Abs’ killing & Sonny’s stabbing would have taken fold, so once Leo put his actions into play, meaning, once he learned about the seduction plan from Chad talking to his wife is what put Leo’s actions into play, it what started the whole thing, so why negate all of that to show to the viewers that Craig did this, given who’s actions put what into play first?
