Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
But why the need for Tanner as Joey, wouldn’t you think that to make up for letting Lastovic go, that they have him playing Joey for BS-2. I kind of doubt that Stephanie would be on contract, because Kurth’s Justin is needed far more than Kayla’s daughter, meaning, Abs’ being his niece, the character as every right to learn of her death, don’t you thnk, if Tanner’s Joey is recurring, then down the line bring Lastovic or Stine into then, not right after BS-2 ends, don’t you think?
I can’t see JKJ’s Philip being on contract, given as to what GR’s Leo would do to him, if he ends up finding Philly-boy to destroy Chloe & Brady, wouldn’t that end up throwing JKJ away as well?
Then this: It wastes screen-time of the focal point, meaning, Abs’ killer, do we really need to see Philly’s temper tirade?
I can’t see that Stephanie would be a new love interest for Chad, because with how Chad is mourning his wife’s death, do you really think that he would be EJ, meaning, waiting a month after his wife’s brutal murder, that he would start humping Kayla’s daughter?
Don’t get me wrong, I would love to see Melanie coming back. But with how there was a need to get rid of Lastovic’s Joey, by sending him to a new business venture with Stephanie & why would there be a need for the Johnson Siblings to show up, especially with the finances of this show be in dire straits?
Then, with what Leo had done, do you really think that we need to see Leo finding Philip & get Phlly-boy to help him to get rid of Chloe & Brady & putting the suspicion onto Leo as to who had killed Abigail, given that there may be a story to prove that Lucas may not end up not being Abs’ killer, the way they did Clyde?
Last thing: That means that Will & Sonny go back to Phoenix, that Justin will never be seen again, Bonnie, for that matter, Maggie as well, & then Victor as well. Don’t you think that it’s very odd that they are so willing to throw Tinker, Massey, Kurth, Evans & Rogers away for actors who occasionally show up, that come & go, come & go, etc. etc, given that as what may happen to Dattilo’s Lucas, given the fall-out of the wedding?
What I find odd that is that no one knows at all that Leo was in the DeMira Homestead the night that Abigail was offed, don’t you think?
Then this: With how they had put it out there that Abs isn’t staying dead down the line, but they kill her off just because she wants to focus her family life?
We saw that happen when Massey had told the wrong people that he wanted to focus on his education & when he told the wrong people, they went ahead off his recast’s Will & yet they bring him back alive to play up of what Rolf & Susan had done to Will’s mind.
So to my opinion, they better keep Abigail dead & gone & never have her return, because if they do bring her back alive, Leo gets off & do we need that?
Think about it, if they bring her back alive & well, that means that there was no need for any of what they have been playing out, meaning the mystery as to who had killed Abby, don’t you think?
It’s like throwing away their best work, meaning, with how Massey, Boatman, Arnold, Sweeney, Flynn, look at how they masterfully played it up for when they saw Sweeney’s Sami go ballistic, it throws away Hall’s performance with Sweeney’s Sami after the fall-out all that was thrown away by bring Abs back down the line, now wouldn’t it, so was there a need for it?
Instagram are photos into the actors & actresses personal lives, not what shows they are on. On the soapsheknows message board is where I had seen the cast of Beyond Salem 2, not once did they have Loretta Devine, Christopher Sean, Colton Little, much less Shin’s sister who had never been mentioned on the network’s show, now has she?
I don’t know if Chris’ Paul has a new paramour, i.e. Andrew Donovan. but if Andrew is his new paramour, isn’t it very odd that, yes, granted Andrew is not either Will & or Sonny, but it had been mentioned at what age Sonny came out to his parents, but yet, they don’t allow Andrew to keep his parents in the loop about it?
But remember Christopher Sean, he still did both Days & Hawaii 5-0, didn’t he?
What makes Lamon think the show he’s on now won’t kill off his character & then recast it with a minority actor, that’s what Queen Sugar did when they killed off Vaughan’s character & recasted with an ethnic actor, didn’t they?
I get that Kurth is not on contract, but Bonnie is seldom seen, she has the name just because she married into the name, Xander may be a Kiriakis, but all we are seeing has nothing to do with the family. The same with Sonny, the only time he was seen was when he was rendered unconscious & stripped & when he & Will comforted Chad when it came to Abigail, after that, he’s no longer seen, now was he? I get that Kurth is with GH & with Days & that he doesn’t have a contract with Days but why not a pinch-hit actor for the character to know of his niece’s death?
What I’m getting at is this: With how Justin never being seen unless he sees a client needing a lawyer at the station & with how we never see Sonny, given how long he wasn’t seen until they had him & Will to go see Chad, & with Aniston’s failing health, why would a long lost Kiriakis show up to no family ?
I understand that RSW is on contract, but there being a need to have Ben leave with Ciara & with Archey & Stowers had left when there was no need for them to go, given that Lani had no reason to fear for Vivian, because there’s no need for Dano much less Sorel & with how long she hasn’t been seen, they think that she still possesses a threat to Lani?
The reason for this reply is that with RSW playing a Kiriakis, they may end putting in effect that Alex Kiriakis & Ben are twin brothers, the same way they have Jake & Stefan being twins, because Jake is so willing to go down the same road that his brother did, when he’s trying to get out of his brother’s shadow, now isn’t he?
But there is no story to explain Abby in using pronouns the way they are in this day & age, now is there. Then there’s this, with Abby using the “pronouns” as in they, it may lean to who uses those pronouns to identify the killer. Meaning, Leo, I can see Leo using the pronouns the way Chanel is.
The reason as to why I can’t see it being a red-herring, is that red-herrings are never shoved down people’s throats AD NAUSEUM. Red-herrings are only used to very subtlety.
Think about it this way: Remember when they had Laura putting it out there about Gwen, she brought it up to her daughter & granddaughter that Tiffany had put it out there of her 8 year old daughter, making it 1983 when the character was born but the actress was born 2 years later.
Once they put it out there as to who the character is that murdered Abigail, who’s going to believe it, given as to when they wrote the story to reveal the killer. What I mean is that when the killer is exposed & we see the flashback to the murder to show who did it would be negated, because the events of the murder were never seen, so who’s going to believe what happened when, was not shown until the flashback is seen.
I know that Ben & Ciara are sailing off with each other, but, still can you really see Clyde being the killer, given that Abs’ dying words to Chad was they had a knife & the last thing that Clyde would do is give power to EJ to use over his head, don’t you think?
Can you really see anyone that has no connection to Abigail to end up being her killer, given that they had put it out there that she’s not staying dead forever?
But still with Eve & Vivian not seen anymore after both actresses have left, was it wise to have the character of Vivian posing a threat in order for The Grant Foursme to leave for Maryland?
But the main problem I have is that how does Evan have no knowledge of his romp with Jan but had to be told about the result of the romp from his father when has no knowledge of the romp. Don’t you think?
Especially when Alexander Kiriakis’ brother & dad are M.I.A., isn’t very odd that they are willing to let Ben & Ciara go but keep RSW to play another character but they get rid of the other character he plays, don’t you think?
So, if they didn’t want Chad to be in limbo & facing it, you can’t move on with the Chad Abigail story if there’s no Abby, so if she was willing work off contract & be their for her baby, was there a need to kill & then put it out there that she’s not staying that way, just because she has a baby.
Their have been actors & or actresses who replaces the original. Like, Robert Adamson playing Michael on General Hospital, the actresses who have played Alexis on GH, like for instance Susan Diol., heck they even used Susan Diol to play a younger version of Lila Quartermaine for a Christmas fantasy. They had Nick Kiriazis filling in for Ted King on GH, they had Ethan Erickson playing Patrick Drake on GH as well. So why not get a temporary actress to play Abigail until Miller is willing to come back again, especially when they had put out there that Abby isn’t staying dead, did they not?
But if there are actors & or actresses who aren’t on contract & that are recurring & that Marci was willing to do just that, why refuse it? It’s just like Freddie & Chandler, they had to learn that they were let go by way of their script instead of telling their people who would be willing to their clients.
Remember, they did say that Abigail isn’t staying dead for good, so wh6 refuse as to what she was willing to do?
But aren’t there actresses & as well as actors who aren’t on contract that are shown sporadically, like Allison Sweeney, she’s not under contract & they allow her to sporadically show up as well, the same with Chandler Massey, he’s not under contract & they have reduced him to recurring, they could easily have done that with Marci, remember, the newspaper that Jack & Jennifer has in Boston, they could have had her take over that paper & have her film scenes in her own home, hence, Freddie. They could easily have done that, yes, she can’t commit full term, so allow her to sporadically, especially with how they had put it out there that sometime in the future where they bring her back alive some day, don’t you think?
If TPTB allowed Freddie. Then allowing VK to work off & on. I get that they weren’t interested with doing this with Abby’s character & that they wanted Marci to be all in or all gone. Then putting it out there that just because Abby has been killed off, doesn’t mean it’s forever & that they could bring the character back to life one day, then why the need to write the character’s death, just so the actress can spend time with baby, it’s not like the baby triumphs the show, given how much older the show is over the child, don’t you think?
