Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The next question that I have is the letters that she had written to Brady, Tate & Theresa. With Brady & Theresa were willing to forgive Holly, then why wasn’t there any of that at all when it came to the letter that she had penned for Tate? If she was so willing to write what she wrote to Brady & Theresa, & that she had done that & as a result of that was them being willing to forgive, to me, it shows that she never meant that at all when it came to the content of the letters that she had written, given the content of the letter that Tate had read. Right? So the question that I have is what happens if & when Brady & Theresa ends up reading the letter that Holly penned to Tate & learns that what Holly had written was a smokescreen for them buy, what then?
Then why is she using the death of her sibling as an excuse in not saying anything, she goes from hot to cold, hot to cold, hot to cold, every time possible & keep making it an excuse, I get that she’s a teenager, but still, don’t you think that using a teenage mentality, no matter if she is one or not, it has to end sometime, doesn’t it. It’s too repetitive. Right?
If Holly doesn’t respect Nicole, then explain to me as to why she was willing to ask how much punishment she should receive, much less with Holly knowing what the death of her sibling had done to her mother, why would she put her mother through what could have happened to herself?
Brady gets fired by Alex because of what Tate’s school is making him out to be, all because of Holly’s actions. Then Alex would also end up firing Theresa as well because of what Holly is allowing her school to make Tate out to be, then EJ would be fired as well, given that he knew about Holly buying the narcotics & he’s making the entire town to believe that Tate is the cause of the drug trafficking, then to make matters worse, Tate doesn’t want his parents to interfere with anything regarding this & is loving that his school & Holly is putting him through this. Don’t you dare bring up a teenage mindset as an excuse, either, right?
Yes, I get that Clyde & Stefan set Xander up, but there’s no motive, Xander has no reason to shoot Harris, Harris knows who shot him, & he’s staying silent as a Charlie Chaplin movie, then, they failed to prove that the weapon was used by Xander, doesn’t even has his prints, all they showed was the weapon was in his home, but did Xander have it when he went running, NO. Then the text that Sarah had seen that came in while Xander was running, hence, showing that he didn’t even have his phone went when he went running, now did he? So you tell me how the narrative did not come from the minds of the writing team of Howard The Duck?
But would Xander, given that he no clue until he saw it brought in & it was shown to him, remember, Sarah saw the text that came in while he was running showing that he never had his phone when he went running, so with him not having his phone during his running, that makes him the shooter, given that he never had his phone when, how-come that doesn’t show any red-flags. In order for him to do the shooting, he had to have it on him & did he?
Everett Lynch & Robert Stein, doesn’t connect him to the Hortons, now does it? Remember, think of it this way, were either characters created before Nick Fallon in order to have both of them to be connected to Nick Fallon? I can see that there is a connection, because he wanted to hear from Julie about Nick’s past. I get that, & the six degrees, would have them be related to Nick, given the national debt of branches on the Horton Family Tree are Horton derived. Then there’s this: We still don’t know who was paid by Clyde to torch Alice & Tom’s home, now do we, do we really need for them to put out there that a connection to Nick Fallon & or the Horton Family to learn that either Everett & or Robert to be the one who set the fire?
My version is the law in the soap universe. I know that it doesn’t happen in reality. It wasn’t shown or mentioned as to how Justin had gotten the exculpatory evidence, it wouldn’t be the first time that Justin did something underhanded, remember, the judge that tried to have his way with Gwen, that was when Bonnie & Xander were still prison, both of them got roommates, Xandy had gotten Justin & Bonnie had gotten Gwen, when her recording of a judge sexually harassing her was used by Justin to blackmail the judge with, but that’s just an example. Then, let’s say I’m an actor & I play a lawyer on soap, no less, there is no way would I ever hand over holes to the defense lawyer & use those holes to get his client off, now would I? They could have easily have played up did Xander use the gun, did he handle it, no they had to charge all because of what was found. That’s what I mean.
You are using the real-life legal system to justify what goes on in fiction???WTF You find me any fictional non-shown legal counsel to throw the case & present holes to the opposition, i.e. the defense team or lawyer for the defense? Think about it. If I played a lawyer in a soap & I’m the prosecutor, I’m allowed to hand over holes in my evidence to the defense to get his & or her client off, given that he or she used nefarious ways to get out of it, especially given that person that committed the crime, had no description at all, much less knowledge as to what the suspect was wearing to buy an extremely priced knock-off to frame the suspect who had no motive at all to act on the crime at hand. Remember, the gun that was found, was it ever proven that Xander touched it, or used it, no, all they did was to show where it was found. When Sami was a suspect in Charlie’s murder, she & Rafe proved that she was still in flight at the time of Charlie’s murder, why couldn’t they not show that Xander’s prints weren’t on the weapon, or know it was found until it was shown to him in the interrogation room.
So why the constant need to put him front & center & allow him to monopolize the whole episode, it isn’t just about him, with any one & I mean anyone agreeing that these horrible stories are so blatant, don’t use up the entire half hour to it. Right?
Actually, to the best of my knowledge, the prosecution has no right to give the defense everything he’s going to use or to have it to be known as exculpatory evidence, because he allows the opposing counsel to poke holes in it & using those holes to get his client, off & what prosecution would allow that, being willing to throw his own case by giving the holes to the defense?
The proof is useless, he can’t clear his name at all, because he illegally went through all of the stuff that Justin had stolen from the prosecution to give Xander for him to go illegally through & then had illegally went through the footage to show to Rafe. The case is closed because the shooter is in prison, & that all the parties involved know that Stefan is in prison & with Harris being as silent as Charlie Chaplin movie, & Stefan in prison, they leave the case open for Xander to find an illegal loophole. Sonny may no longer be there anymore, but still, he would never be free with what Leo put him through because it was never disclosed the public, now was it.
But what proof. That proof is useless now, now isn’t it, given that no one knows that Harris’ shooter is behind bars & Harris has been silent as a Charlie Chaplin movie, so you tell me why the story of proving that Xandy was framed when it’s useless, because the damage has been done. Just like when Sonny was accused of sexual harassment, he was never vindicated because it was never made public, now was it?
What I saw was that she had the copy of the correct results, & had left it on the desk with the copy that EJ has, he locked up his copy, hers were never put in the safe, remember, she ran out & she saw the results that EJ locked away wasn’t her copy. Then this: the results that Kayla came back in her office with wasn’t tampered with, because those results came back in with Kayla long before Sloan rushed in to say that this test that Holly had Eric to donate his stuff to wasn’t her consent, now was it?
If the Will wasn’t doctored, then why was it in the Will that Alex got 50% & Maggie had gotten the other 50%? The reason I’m not buying that letter was doctored, is because of the fact Constantine & or Theresa would fear that their prints were on it, showing that they doctored it, right? Have they been playing up of one or the other fearing about that?
